Add new comment

Re - Geography

Posted by Nick Stripe on 01/12/2006 - 15:07

Some interesting comments here. Thank you. I'll ruminate on them a bit more and may return to them. But my initial thoughts surround:
1. Emphasising our desire to assess whether there may be methods that could be employed to protect confidentiality with overlapping small area geographies for the Census.
2. Re-iterating that we need a geography that works for non Census datasets too - e.g. all the administrative datasets on Neighbourhood Stats. We don't have access to unit records for these, they arrive pre aggregated - usually to relatively large building blocks (SOAs not OAs). This brings a problem in trying to convert these data to alternative boundaries.

Reply

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by the acceptable use policy as stated in the terms and conditions for this site. We reserve the right not to publish comments that contravene any of these rules.

*
*
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <p> <br> <h2> <h3> <strike> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.