Add new comment

A stable geography?

Posted by Analyst (not verified) on 28/11/2006 - 08:27

A stable geography supports analysis over time which is a good thing. However the super output areas do not always match the areas we wish to analyse and that can cause a problem so should there be a redraw?
I think there are two points to consider
(1) If SOAs were redrawn now to reflect local communities how long would it be before there were calls to redraw again because communities had changed?
(2) If it were possible to produce statistics for specific communities from SOAs would people be more inclined to forget to take into account other factor such as year on year variability and changes to the underlying population when making comparisons?
I think the current boundaries should be kept - what may be needed is more help and guidance for people who are unfamiliar with them and so still want figures for administrative areas such as wards.
I look forward to seeing what other people think.

Reply

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by the acceptable use policy as stated in the terms and conditions for this site. We reserve the right not to publish comments that contravene any of these rules.

*
*
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <p> <br> <h2> <h3> <strike> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.